W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: writing a triple filter?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 16:16:59 -0500
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1123276619.18971.619.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 15:02 -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
> Dogs,
> How do I say, in a CONSTRUCT query, that if there's a triple T in the
> solution set,

I can't parse that. Solution sets are made of bindings, not triples.

>  I don't want it in the output graph? I thought something like
> FILTER fn:not(T), but that doesn't work in the WHERE clause. But that
> doesn't seem to be legal.
> Do we have any functions that operate on triples?

I suspect what you want can be done with !bound(?v) gymnastics.

Can you give me a little more context?

> Cheers, 
> Kendall
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 5 August 2005 21:17:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:48 UTC