W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: [Fwd: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax] (badIRIRef)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:02:22 -0500
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1122915742.18971.59.camel@localhost>

On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 13:38 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>  > Dear RDF Data Access Working Group,
>  >
>  >   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ section 10.1
>  > notes "IRIs are ordered by comparing the character strings making up
>  > each IRI" it's however not clear how character strings are compared,
>  > I would have expected that a `string < string` operator is defined, but
>  > section 11.1 only defines such an operator for numeric and dateTime
>  > types. Please change the draft such that ordering of IRIs is clear.
>  >
>  > regards,
> 
> 
> The current grammar does have a rather open production for QuotedIRIref 
> (anything except space and >).

Note that I added this to the issues list.
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#badIRIRef


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 17:02:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT