W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: rq23 v1.409

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 09:31:57 +0100
Message-ID: <42C4FF7D.20809@hp.com>
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>



Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 04:32:52PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
>>Kendall, I'm standing by for your review of that.
> 
> 
> In the definition's text "if QS is the set of solution" should be "set of
> solutions", I believe.

Thanks for catching that - fixed.  It's a stock phrase so it's wrong in all the 
result set definitions.

> 
> The new text discharges the action. I still don't like the design, but
> that's a separate (and, for now, moot) question.

I'd still like to hear the alternative design that covers the result forms in 
the match-modify-result processing model (or a different processing model).  For 
ASK, the solutions modifiers only affect the empty/non-empty test of the 
solution sequence in trivial ways so don't add anything in practice.  But the 
symmetry of the same process everywhere seems valuable.

> 
> Kendall

	Andy
Received on Friday, 1 July 2005 08:32:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT