W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: what about RDF format?

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:49:52 +0000
Message-ID: <42413BC0.4030303@hp.com>
To: Yoshio FUKUSHIGE <fuku@w3.org>
CC: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Yoshio FUKUSHIGE wrote:
> Hi, again, 
> # due to two cups of coffee, which keeps me awake in midnight
> In the language doc, we have 
> "Results can be returned in RDF, in XML the 
> SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format and also in forms specific to
> implementation APIs"
> So, what do we have as RDF result formats?
> If none, I think we should provide one.
> If any, I think we should guide users to them.
> Best,
> Yoshio
> fuku@w3.org
> fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com


For testing, we have been using


because tests evaluate to a graph for SELECT and CONSTRUCT,
then one way to check the results is to do a graph comparison.

THis vocabulary can't cope with sorted results.

This could form the basis of an RDF form.

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 09:51:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:46 UTC