- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:49:52 +0000
- To: Yoshio FUKUSHIGE <fuku@w3.org>
- CC: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Yoshio FUKUSHIGE wrote: > Hi, again, > # due to two cups of coffee, which keeps me awake in midnight > > In the language doc, we have > > "Results can be returned in RDF, in XML the > SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format and also in forms specific to > implementation APIs" > > So, what do we have as RDF result formats? > > If none, I think we should provide one. > > If any, I think we should guide users to them. > > Best, > Yoshio > fuku@w3.org > fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com > > > Yoshio, For testing, we have been using http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/result-set.n3 because tests evaluate to a graph for SELECT and CONSTRUCT, then one way to check the results is to do a graph comparison. THis vocabulary can't cope with sorted results. This could form the basis of an RDF form. Andy
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 09:51:32 UTC