Re: modulo operator dropped from editor's draft? from Seaborne, Andy on 2005-03-23 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2005)

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:38:12 +0000
To: "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
CC: "'public-rdf-dawg@w3.org'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <42413904.7080000@hp.com>

Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Was the modulo operator intentionally dropped from the editor's draft?
> I didn't see it called out explicitly in the change log.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -bryan
> 

Bryan,

If it was there, it was a placeholder until value testing got sorted out. It's 
not in the list in 11.2.

Are you proposing including it? There is an F&O op:numeric-mod operator that 
would back it.

 Andy

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 09:39:37 UTC