Hi, I remember we discussed about the semantics accompanied with our reification syntax? (Am I wrong? Please excuse me) If my understanding is correct, the semantics of "reification" differs from RDF/XML and N3 (in the latter it might have to be called "quoting?") My question is which semantics do we accompany to our syntax (what was the resolution) ? Literal reading of the document leads to the answer of saying: "we mean the former, for it's syntax sugar for RDF reification." But our syntax is so close to N3 (by now), I wonder if we step forward (out?) to quoting. In case we should not do so, I think commenting it(=the difference) in the doc is worth doing. How do you think? Yoshio fuku@w3.org fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.comReceived on Tuesday, 22 March 2005 18:58:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:01 GMT