W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Mar

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:08:39 +0000
Message-ID: <423FEEA7.8050703@hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> 1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
>    2005-03-22T14:30Z **
>     log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2005/03/22-dawg-irc
>     WG home:   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
> 
> scribe: JanneS
> 
>  Minutes RDF DAWG telecon 2005-03-15 for review
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0358.html
> 
> next meeting: 2005-03-29. scribe volunteer?
> 
> comments on agenda?
>  sorry it's late by ~5 hrs

No problem here.


. . . .

 > 3. Test suite maintenance
 >

Not directly about the agenda but this reminded me to ask: I have been assumed 
we would eventually publish the (cleaned up) test suite as a companion to the 
other documents.  Is this true?  What might the timescale be?  I realise it ihas 
been hard to finalize tests when other things are changing.  Is it reasonable to 
finish this off during QL CR (i.e. would that risk invalidaing the CR process 
for the QL).

 > ACTION AndyS: to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting 
test cases)

Not done - is it a serious inconvenience if this is delayed until after the QL 
candidate draft (i.e until April sometime).



 > 5. SPARQL QL edits
 >
 > ACTION AndyS: to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption

Not done.

 >
 > ACTION AndyS: to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH.

"get a whole graph" done (1.254)

	Andy
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2005 10:09:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:22 GMT