W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:40:01 +0000
Message-ID: <423F4D41.3090408@hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 14:59 -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote: 
> 
>>On Mar 21, 2005, at 2:21 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:27 -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote:
> 
> [...] 
> 
>>>>I think it implicit in using WSDL.
>>>
>>>Our discussion was fairly explicit to the contrary:
>>>
>>>    <xs:element name='queryString' type='xs:string'/> <!-- in, e.g.,
>>>SPARQL syntax -->
>>
>>I'm sorry, I didn't realize that had force instead of being merely a 
>>straw proposal for discussion.
> 
> 
> It was just a straw proposal for discussion.
> 
> But I understand the requirement to be about writing a WSDL description
> for the protocol that's equivalent to these HTML forms...
> 
>   http://sparql.org/query.html

Now with added "graph-id".  I'm being conservative - only implementing 
what's high probability (IMHO) of being in the spec because it creates 
support costs for me otherwise.

I don't see how rdf-dataset maps into HTTP usage.

	Andy


>   http://librdf.org/query?language=sparql
> 
> and is given in the 1st example in
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
> 
> There's no XML serialization of the query needed for that.
> 
> 

<snip/>

	Andy
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 22:40:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:22 GMT