EricP, Andy, I just saw a comment... "Section B: * Given the large number of similarities between SPARQL and SeRQL, it's hard to imagine that SeRQL was not used as a reference language. If it was used, we would really appreciate if a reference to SeRQL was added to this section." where section B is the references section... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#references Please clearly cite the normative references and separate them from informative references and acknowledgements. The list of edtior's tools http://www.w3.org/2003/Editors/#tools includes a bibliography tool http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-biblio-ui that works really well. Eek... no acknowledgements section... I recommend you add one, and each time you integrate a comment, acknowledge the commentor by name. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 21 March 2005 20:26:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:01 GMT