- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:55:53 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:37:21PM -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > "Motivates: (do we need a WSDL req?)" > > indeed... we have one... Excellent. My trolling elicited the response I wanted. I *thought* we had one but wasn't sure. I will add it and check-in soon. > Hm... the sorting use case doesn't use limit... if you don't > use limit, you might as well sort the results after you get them, no? > It seems to me that the use case should be a "give me the 1st N > items..." use case in order to motivate sorting in the query engine. > Not critical, though. I will add that wrinkle. I don't think it's a problem as-is, though. > I'm inclined to publish this UC&R document soon... it seems to me > that we earlier set a signal that our requirements were stable, > but due to comments etc., we have done some significant stuff > w.r.t. our requirements and objectives: > > - added WSDL requirement > - added sorting objective > - we made a pretty big change w.r.t. human friendly syntax > - we postponed accessingCollections Seems reasonable. Kendall Clark
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 19:59:45 UTC