W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: does DAWG actually have time to do WSDL?

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:44:42 -0500
Message-Id: <44034ebc4e30f8ae5a64ff5ed4c71f13@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

On Mar 21, 2005, at 12:05 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> These actions are three weeks old with no movement. Maybe
> WSDL is more of a schedule risk than we realized? Are there
> other WG members that can help? Hugo, PLH, do you have time to help?
> ACTION Bijan: to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement

Sent to Kendall.

> ACTION EricP: to review WSDL text proposal
> ACTION KendallC: to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft,
> propose to WG
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html#item_03
> also...
> "For protocol, best guess is maybe 4 Apr for LC candidate."

Since this strikes me as an implausible date for the query language LC, 
and I believe that Protocol is dependent on the query langauge, then I 
find this an implausible date for protocol LC.

Things that need to be completed for protocol (IMHO):
	1) XML syntax for query language with XML Schema description (kendall 
and I are working on that; of course, bit of a moving target as the 
query language keeps changing, or potentially changing)
	2) Sensible XML Schemable XML output format (I thought this was the 
same as the xsi:type discussion, but I'm happy to raise a separate 

Once these are done, the rest is fairly straightforward.


P.S. I don't understand why this was sent to w3c-archive and not 
public-rdf-dawg, which seems more appropriate, so I reply to that 
instead of to w3c-archive.

P.P.S. I thought protocol was on a staggered schedule. 4 days for 
candidate LCs doesn't seem to be a staggering at all, in practice.
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 17:44:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:46 UTC