W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

RE: XML serialization of SPARQL

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:19:09 -0800
To: <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: "Steve Harris" <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JMEJKDCPGHHIANHOMPDBIEJKCLAA.howardk@fatdog.com>



 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
 > [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Seaborne, Andy
 > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:03 AM
 > To: Bijan Parsia
 > Cc: Steve Harris; public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
 > Subject: Re: XML serialization of SPARQL

   [ snip ... ]

 > And timing points:
 >
 > A/ An XML syntax would be useful in situations outlined here -
 > so would be RDF
 > one for RDF tools - but what happens about the test suite?  Is
 > one syntax the
 > primary one for defining tests?
 >
 > B/ As the purpose is for XML tools, I'd like to see a input from those
 > communities during the creation of the XML syntax, during the
 > requirments.

+1.

I'd be happy to help request/collate feedback in that area. Whether it's me
or somebody else: How do you define those communities? Who do you see using
an XML syntax and primarily to what end?

Howard
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 16:26:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:22 GMT