Re: protocol doc changed...

Kendall Clark wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Based on the work we did in Boston, and some of the decisions we made,
> I've updated (well, changed, anyway) the protocol editor's draft to
> reflect the use of WSDL, removing a lot what is now cruft.
> 
> Please find the revised draft here:
>        
>        $Revision: 1.18 $ of $Date: 2005/03/10 20:31:44 $
>        http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
> 
> I also checked in the start of a WSDL 2.0 description of the protocol,
> which I intend to be a normative appendix in the spec, once it's fully
> debugged.
> 
> A partial list of changes includes:
> 
>  - Ripped out the RFC 2616 notation
>  - moved glossary to end of doc
>  - linked to (eventually normative appendixed) WSDL 2.0 instance

I'm getting 403 from 
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol.wsdl
which is linked in section 2.

	Andy

>  - removed lots of obsolete junk
>  - updated SADDLE example to match what we did in Boston
>  - reorganized, renamed most sections
>  - no more "abstract" and "concrete" sections
>  - protocol now specified in terms of interfaces, types, responses, 
>    and bindings (HTTP and SOAP)
>  - added interface for "graph maintenance" operations: dropGraph & makeGraph

"maintenance" suggests to me a data management function (maintenance of the 
server and the deployment), not an client application function ability.

	Andy

> 
> It's not in an especially *useful* state, but I think the state it's
> in is reflective of the direction it's moving, and it seemed like the
> earlier that's communicated to others, the better.
> 
> Kendall Clark
>

Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 13:21:51 UTC