- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:51:25 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: andy.seaborne@hp.com, "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:26:13AM +0000, Dave Beckett wrote: > There is no need to support this triple bloat. Reification has remained > a bad idea since 1998. Hmm, I have to disagree with Dave here. Reification is useful and the issue of whether it does (or must) cause "triple bloat" is orthogonal to our purpose here (IMO). > If anything deserves more syntax support in isn't this, it's collections > which helps modern RDF designs such as OWL. They both do. We really need something for collections! Making SPARQL unuseful over OWL ontologies is a very bad thing. Kendall
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 14:01:06 UTC