Re: N most-recent news items, a use case motivating a SORT requirement from Dave Beckett on 2005-03-11 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2005)

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:17:00 +0000
To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1110536221.31682.15.camel@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 10:30 +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:27:50 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > Anybody like the idea of addressing that use case in SPARQL?
> > Any design ideas or implementation experience with sorting?
> > 
> > Hmm... hard to argue that it's a bad idea; I think the discussion we've
> > had is more of the form "it can wait"; i.e. perhaps it belongs on the
> > issues list as "postponed".
> 
> I like the idea of postponing it.

Yes, I prefer to postpone sorting.

That's also my default answer for all changes at this point in the
process.

Dave

Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 10:17:37 UTC