W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: ACTION Bijan: to work on "closeOver" work-alike with

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:18:56 -0500
Message-Id: <dd41da3ce0b3f038b978a32f8f9bebf9@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

On Mar 7, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 13:17 -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> [...]
>>>> If the action was to show the feasibility, then it is completed.
>>> I suppose it's done to my satisfaction,
>> When will you be sure? I mean, I do need to know whether this action 
>> is
>> done.
> Flipping the "done" bit on an action is something we tend to do
> as a group.


> At a minimum, the chair notes it done in the
> agenda, nobody requests a change to the agenda, and it goes
> in the minutes as done.

Got it.

> In other cases, it gets scheduled for discussion; the owner
> is asked whether they consider it done or not, and other
> folks get a chance to negotiate. You might say "yes, I've
> done as much as I intend to" and somebody might ask some
> questions that motivate you to give it another go.
> So I'll be sure it's done

Ok.that's a little different than "done to your satisfaction". Given 
that you are a member of the group, is there anything more you'd like 
to see on this action, other than the fixes I've sent?

>  when the minutes of tomorrow's
> telcon come out (and nobody says they're wrong after a
> few days).

Sorry for conflating the "done" and "done to your satisfaction". I 
wasn't clear which hat you were wearing.

So, I guess I just want to know if my filling in the blanks clarified 
the particular strategy we worked out.

Oops. I see a follow up. Lemme switch over there.

Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 20:18:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:46 UTC