W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: SPARQL syntax proposals

From: Yoshio Fukushige <fuku@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:29:05 -0500
Message-ID: <001901c520be$28412440$fc2ea5ce@IRONGEAR>
To: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

>> How about _:foo ? It seems like that should be allowed for symmetry,
>> letting people use bNode sugar, but not the longhand form would be odd.
>> Also, is "in" a typo? Should it be ":in" or something?
> +1 to having _:foo as well.  Sometimes, the syntactic sugar can't express 
> a graph structure.
> [The bNode-in-query label is just for parsing to be able to say "same as 
> that one" and is distinct from any bNode in the data target]

+1 for _:foo

This (direction) makes creating the query from existent graph easier.

i.e. A user can make a query from existent graph (or graph in his/her mind)
by replacing *just* nodes in question by variables, which is natural.
Without :foo, the user should replace all the bnodes with variables, which 
is an extra burden.

Yoshio Fukushige
Received on Friday, 4 March 2005 13:27:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:46 UTC