W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: SPARQL syntax proposals

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:50:35 -0500
Message-Id: <a7ca9f6f812d555dc06720bac158a0ee@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>

On Mar 3, 2005, at 4:51 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> On Tuesday, the DAWG f2f took up syntax issues.

I should add/clarify... we made a decision on punctuation syntax in 
Helsinki...
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html#item18
but that Helsinki decision wasn't by consensus, and each outstanding
objection is a risk that our request for CR will be turned down.

So I consulted some of the WG members during a break about whether they
would like to spend some meeting time discussing this with TimBL. Based
on that advice, I invited TimBL to join the discussion. I made it clear 
that
we weren't quorate to decide anything, since this wasn't on the agenda
in time.

As we reviewed the Helsinki records, I heard several people say "oh, I 
didn't
understand the proposal that way" which sounds like new information. So 
I'm
re-opening the decision. And for tracking purposes, I'm putting it on 
the issues list:

  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax

There seemed to be quit a bit of support for this syntax proposal here 
in Boston,
so I'm hoping everybody can consider it before the 8 March telcon. I 
won't be
there; Kendall has agreed to chair.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2005 22:50:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:22 GMT