- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:53:25 -0500
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Feb 26, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Kendall Clark wrote: > Folks, > > I've updated the editor's draft of the protocol doc: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ > > where you should find > > $Revision: 1.17 $ of $Date: 2005/02/26 21:51:28 $ The SADDLE stuff looks like a good basis for discussion. Hmm... Domain: G, S... is that short rdfs:domain G, S or for rdfs:domain [ owl:unionOf (G S ) ]. ? I think you mean the latter. Better say so somehow. Maybe just use RDFS/OWL/turtle like that? The "abstract protocol notation" section... hmm... more stuff between our readers and the "hello world" example. We've had mixed feedback from within the WG and elsewhere about whether an abstract protocol is the way to go, so I took a crack at taking a "hello world" example from UC&R, putting it up front, and following it with as little specification as I think we could get away with, to give us another organization to consider: The SPARQL Service Interface http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/prot26 $Id: prot26.html,v 1.1 2005/02/27 05:25:44 connolly Exp $ It's 2 pages printed; I think the stuff between the title page and the references section would fit on one page. I think the interface it specifies is used in a couple actual SPARQL services... hmm... no, http://sparql.org/books complains when I leave the lang=SPARQL out. The rasqual demo wants a uri= for the background graph, plus it wraps the results in HTML. Hmm... http://demo2.asemantics.com/rdfstore/rdql/ seems to use POST. ew. ;-) EricP, where's the algae SPARQL thingy? I can't find it from http://esw.w3.org/topic/DawgShows -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Sunday, 27 February 2005 05:53:25 UTC