[Hi from KC airport; jumping in on just one point here...] On Feb 26, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:46:20PM -0600, Pat Hayes wrote: >> By the way, what exactly is an "RDF graph resource", again? That >> sounds like it might be a useful idea, deserving of glossary entry. > > Hmm, perhaps I've gotten myself into trouble here, but I think I only > meant that an "RDF graph resource" is a resource identified by a URI > which has a representation with an RDF MIME type. That seems pretty coherent, and, as Pat said, useful. > Again, I think the easiest thing to do is to drop talk of "RDF graph > resources". I dunno... it seems like something worth keeping. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Saturday, 26 February 2005 20:26:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:34 GMT