pls don't refer to DAWG in sparql abstract from Dan Connolly on 2005-02-16 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2005)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:46:03 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1108565163.4991.534.camel@localhost>

I see in the abstract of
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/

"It is designed to meet the requirements and design objectives described
in the W3C RDF Data Access Working Group (DAWG) document "RDF Data
Access Use Cases and Requirements"."

Please remove mention of the WG. The WG is a fleeting phenomenon;
the only mention of it should be in the status section.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 14:46:04 UTC