W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

pls don't refer to DAWG in sparql abstract

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:46:03 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1108565163.4991.534.camel@localhost>

I see in the abstract of
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/

"It is designed to meet the requirements and design objectives described
in the W3C RDF Data Access Working Group (DAWG) document "RDF Data
Access Use Cases and Requirements"."

Please remove mention of the WG. The WG is a fleeting phenomenon;
the only mention of it should be in the status section.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 14:46:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:22 GMT