- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:03:39 +0000
- To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2005-01-11 for review RDF Data Access WG telcon 2005-01-11 14:30 UTC Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0010.html IRC log http://www.w3.org/2005/01/11-dawg-irc Atendees: Hiroyuki Sato, Dave Beckett, Yoshio Fukushige, Dan Connolly, Janne Saarela, Andy Seabourne, Eric Prud'Hommeau, Steve Harris, Howard Katz Regrets: Kendall Clark, Jos De Roo Scribe: Steve Harris Minutes from RDF DAWG telcon 2004-12-14 http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc ACCEPTED as the record of our previous meeting Next meeting: FTF4 19-20 Jan Kendall has offered to be the 1st scribe 2. FTF4 A sketch of the FTF4 agenda is at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html Reading list will include: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ v 1.1 2004/12/17 17:33:45 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ $Revision: 1.166 2005/01/10 17:59:34 http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20041221/ http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20041012/ ACTION DanC: add rq23 1.666 to ftf4 reading list ACTION: DanC to add http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20041221/ to reading list DanC said that he expects storytelling around protocol at F2F4 Its undecided how to what functions and operators to include, options are pick and choose (menu choice) or bulk import Janne asked if it is OK for press to turn up after day 1 of F2F4 DanC said that press releases should be check with w3t-pr@w3.org ACTION DanC: put Janne in touch with w3t-pr re press at ftf4 3. FTF5 Porposed date is 2005-02-28 - 2005-03-01, no objects DaveB probably has regrets for FTF5 Registration is open: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2005/ 4. XML result set spec publication ACTION: DaveB to post announcement about XML result set on appropraite mailing lists ACTION DanC: ask Liam, via SemWeb CG, which XML groups might be interested in SPARQL result set WD SimonR's action on alternaive unbound results is withdrawn There was some discussion about the ordering of result columns (values with a result set), which is currently undefined. ericP and SteveH expressed a preference for the order they appear in SELECT. Options include query order, lexical, arbitrary ACTION: DaveB discuss options for column ordering and pick one 5. Protocol spec publication ACTION: EricP/KendallC to publish "SPARQL Protocol for RDF" pending approval from TomA and AndyS AndyS has approved this DanC noted that there are some URIs that dont follow the namespace policies will be based on index.html,v 1.1 2004/12/17 17:33:45 DaveB asked ericP to post a link to the modified 1.1 before publishing 6. Services / DawgShows http://esw.w3.org/topic/DawgShows ACTION: KendallC expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying clients 7. Disjunction EricP migrated some Algae UnionDisjunciton test cases http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0464.html DanC noted that the issues list should link to "Proposal to drop disjunction requirement" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0604.html Current words about disjunction are near http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#alternatives A strawpoll was conducted as to wether to drop section 6 (More Pattern Matching # Alternatives) or keep it. 2 were in favour of dropping it, 2 of keeping it, others were undecided. DanC will add some of the open issues to http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/issues-ftf4/ 8. SOURCE Action DONE examples: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0421.html tests: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/source-named/ ACTION: JanneS propose text for hard failure in the protocol draft ACTION: DanC suggest formal definitions for SOURCE Janne is working on a SRARQL driver for JDBC - SPARQL4J http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/sparql4j/ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0421.html represnts daves current preferred solution to source AndyS indicated that that's what rq23 specifies too 9. Call for exclusions http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0014.html New W3C patent policy DanC: patent policy says that if you have any patents that are essential to the practice to this sepc. and you dont want to give a royalty-free licence to the world you have to note it in the call for exclusions Meeting adjourned 15:36 UTC
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2005 21:03:45 UTC