W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: propose to make syntax-qname-08-rq and syntax-qname-14-rq OBSOLETE

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:33:29 -0500
To: jos.deroo@agfa.com
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1119969209.5150.161.camel@localhost>

On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 01:11 +0200, jos.deroo@agfa.com wrote:
> I see that
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#syntax-qname-08-rq
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#syntax-qname-14-rq
> 
> are approved..
> (must have missed that vote..)

it was part of our 7 June decision on punctuationSyntax

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0411.html
<- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax

I'm looking at the archive to see how much notice you had of the
details...

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 14:33:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT