On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 01:11 +0200, jos.deroo@agfa.com wrote: > I see that > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#syntax-qname-08-rq > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#syntax-qname-14-rq > > are approved.. > (must have missed that vote..) it was part of our 7 June decision on punctuationSyntax http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0411.html <- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax I'm looking at the archive to see how much notice you had of the details... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 14:33:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT