W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Refining Optionals

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:43:19 +0100
Message-ID: <42C056D7.50907@hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 13:13 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>The handling of optionals needs to be refined - this isn't changing the test
>>cases and user problem that optionals solves, it a matter of getting a definition
>>that works.
> [...]
>>Details still need to be worked out but I'd appreciate comments and feedback on 
>>the approach.
> I read the whole mail message, but what I learned was that it's the sort
> of thing I need to read a lot more slowly in order to evaluate.
> As I'm already very late with the agenda, I'm not sure when/if I'll
> get to this. I hope others can study it and advise.

That's fine - I realise it does not given much time to dig into the content 
before the telecon.  I got it out to indicate where I'd got to and would 
expect feedback and comments to be via email, rather than via phone time.

Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 19:43:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:47 UTC