W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Refining Optionals

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:42:07 -0500
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
Message-Id: <1119897727.5150.99.camel@localhost>

On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 13:13 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> The handling of optionals needs to be refined - this isn't changing the test
> cases and user problem that optionals solves, it a matter of getting a definition
> that works.
[...]
> Details still need to be worked out but I'd appreciate comments and feedback on 
> the approach.

I read the whole mail message, but what I learned was that it's the sort
of thing I need to read a lot more slowly in order to evaluate.

As I'm already very late with the agenda, I'm not sure when/if I'll
get to this. I hope others can study it and advise.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 18:42:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT