W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Updated definitions (constraint)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:37:16 -0400
Message-Id: <0386fb5c0f6a9d06daa2b93d9e6ba94f@w3.org>
Cc: andy.seaborne@hp.com, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

On Jun 16, 2005, at 7:44 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2005, at 7:15 AM, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>   In a group, all the group elements have to "pass" a solution for 
>> the groiup to match a solution.
>
> Ah... that's what I was missing. Thanks.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#defn_GroupGraphPatter

Hmm... what about this case?

SELECT ?x WHERE { FILTER ( ?x < 10 ) }.

That's got a bzillion solutions, right? Maybe we need a special case 
for that?
Or maybe it's already syntactically illegal or something?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 22:37:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT