Re: Updated definitions (constraint)

On Jun 16, 2005, at 7:44 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2005, at 7:15 AM, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>   In a group, all the group elements have to "pass" a solution for 
>> the groiup to match a solution.
>
> Ah... that's what I was missing. Thanks.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#defn_GroupGraphPatter

Hmm... what about this case?

SELECT ?x WHERE { FILTER ( ?x < 10 ) }.

That's got a bzillion solutions, right? Maybe we need a special case 
for that?
Or maybe it's already syntactically illegal or something?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 22:37:21 UTC