- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:51:09 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Steve Harris wrote:
> Review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ v1.379
>
> 9.3 has
>
> PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>
> PREFIX dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>
>
> SELECT ?who ?g ?mbox
> FROM <dft.ttl>
> FROM NAMED <http://example.org/alice>
> FROM NAMED <http://example.org/bob>
> WHERE
> {
> ?g dc:publisher ?who .
> GRAPH ?g { ?x foaf:mbox ?mbox }
> }
>
> How is <dft.ttl> intended to be interpreted? Is there an implicit BASE if
> none is given? If so it should be stated in 2.1 or if its a special case,
> in 9.3.
>
> - Steve
>
BASE is not necessary - the parser/query processor can produce it from the
document read. I have said that BASE may explicit declare the base IRI.
I have made an absolute IRI for the FROM.
Andy
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 13:52:23 UTC