W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Definition: Solution Sequence Modifier

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 09:09:48 +0100
Message-ID: <42A7F94C.1060509@hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>



Dan Connolly wrote:
> "If SM is set of modifiers, and QS is a set of solutions of a query, we
> write SM(QS) for the sequence formed by applying SM to the solution
> sequence formed from QS."
>  --
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#defn_SolutionSequenceModifer
>   1.373  2005/06/06 14:45:18
> 
> 
> What is *the* sequence formed from QS?

It follows the previous definition (which is based on the one you supplied) on 
how sets of solutions become sequences. I agree there isn't a unique sequence 
formed from the set of solutions.

------
If SM is set of modifiers, and QS is a set of solutions of a query,
we write SM(QS) for *a* sequence formed by applying SM to *some*
solution sequence formed from QS."
------

(without the **, obviously).

	Andy


> 
> Feel free to wait until I come up with replacement text
> to do anything about this...
> 
> ... though I did propose definitions a while ago that
> don't have this problem...
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2005May/0007
> 
> but you seem to have reorganized them substantially since then.
> I'll see if I can come up with a fix within the organizational
> style that you've chosen.
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2005 08:10:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT