W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 7 Jun

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:22:46 -0700
Message-Id: <200506071422.j57EMo4L025960@pyramid-01.kattare.com>
To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Regrets,
Howard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Dan Connolly
> Sent: June 6, 2005 11:47 AM
> To: RDF Data Access Working Group
> Subject: agenda: RDF Data Access 7 Jun
> 
> 
> 1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>   2005-06-07T14:30Z ** local times below
> 
>   tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>   supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>     log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/06/07-dawg-irc
> 
> scribe: ?VOLUNTEER_PLEASE
> 
>   record for review:
>   http://www.w3.org/2005/05/31-dawg-irc
> 
> 
> next meeting: 14 June? chair at risk.
>  scribe volunteer?
> 
> continue the following without discussion:
> ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
> ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
> ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
> ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no
> deadline/urgency)
> ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting
test
> cases) (don't expect quick delivery)
> 
> 
> comments on agenda?
>  sorry it's a few hours late.
>  Lots of open actions on me; I hope to make progress on them
>  before the telcon.
> 
> 
> 2. issue wsdlAbstractProtocol
> 
> 
> ACTION: DanC to try splitting SparqlQuery interface into SparqlGraph
> SparqlBindings
> 
> if I don't manage to make progress on this before the telcon,
> I hope we can close the issue using the editor's draft as written.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
> revision 1.48 to 1.51 which is, as far as this issue
> is concerned, the same as the 27 May WD.
> 
> 
> 
> 3. issue: fromUnionQuery
> 
> We're badly in need of a summary of recent email. I hope
> to put one together, though I'll be happy if somebody beats
> me to it.
> 
> 
> 4. issue valueTesting
> 
> ACTION: DanC to send comment on non-use of
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes to schema comments list
> 
> 
> ACTION: EricP to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe cf.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#extendedType-eq-pass
> 
> 
> ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal
> 
> I gather Steve filled in for DaveB and that this is pretty much
> ready.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 5. punctuationSyntax
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax
> 
> "I have updated the grammar in rq23 in preparation for the LC candidate.
..."
>   --
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0262.html
> 
> 
> 
> 6. pending Comments
> 
> ACTION: DanC to noodle on uri() and str() issue from email
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0239.html
> 
> 
> ACTION: DanC to rethink the use/mention issue w.r.t Tim's email
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0154.html
> 
> this one is still pending too:
> SPARQL requirements (and INSERT)
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Mar/0077.ht
ml
> 
> 
> 7. Last Call for SPARQL QL
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ 1.373 $ of $Date: 2005/06/06
> 14:45:18
> 
> impact of decisions above?
> 
> a number of @@s remain; how many of them need input from people
> other than the editors?
> 
> 2 reviewers?
> 
> last call duration
> 
> last call comment handling process
> 
> 
> 
> 8. Last call for SPARQL protocol
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
> revision 1.48 date: 2005/06/03 20:38:20
> (and status tweaks thru $Revision: 1.51 $ of $Date: 2005/06/06 18:35:00 $
)
> 
> a few TODOs remain (in red). target for finishing them?
> 
> 2 reviewers?
> 
> last call start, duration?
> 
> 
> 9. Last call for SPARQL Query Results XML Format
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/
> $Revision: 1.29 $ of $Date: 2005/05/03 09:58:04 $
> 
> i.e. no changes since 27 May.
> 
> various red notes remain. target for finishing them?
> 
> 
> 
> ** local times
>       [      tlt:localTime  (
>             "Amsterdam"
>             "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
>                      (
>             "Brussels"
>             "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
>                      (
>             "Chicago"
>             "Tue 9:30 AM"  ),
>                      (
>             "Helsinki"
>             "Tue 5:30 PM"  ),
>                      (
>             "London"
>             "Tue 3:30 PM"  ),
>                      (
>             "New York"
>             "Tue 10:30 AM"  ),
>                      (
>             "Rome"
>             "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
>                      (
>             "Tokyo"
>             "Tue 11:30 PM"  ),
>                      (
>             "Vancouver"
>             "Tue 7:30 AM"  );
>              tlt:startTimePage
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=07&month=06&year
> =2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0>;
>              cal:dtstart  [
>                  cal:dateTime "2005-06-07T14:30Z" ] ].
> 
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:23:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT