W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 7 Jun

From: Yoshio Fukushige <fuku@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 16:43:28 +0900
Message-ID: <000d01c56b34$99353680$ebebfe51@IRONGEAR>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Hi,
I have to send my partial regrets

I'm in the AC meeting and not telephone accessible.
However I will join on IRC.

Best,
Yoshio
fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com
fuku@w3.org



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
To: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 3:46 AM
Subject: agenda: RDF Data Access 7 Jun


>
> 1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>  2005-06-07T14:30Z ** local times below
>
>  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/06/07-dawg-irc
>
> scribe: ?VOLUNTEER_PLEASE
>
>  record for review:
>  http://www.w3.org/2005/05/31-dawg-irc
>
>
> next meeting: 14 June? chair at risk.
> scribe volunteer?
>
> continue the following without discussion:
> ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
> ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
> ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
> ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no
> deadline/urgency)
> ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting 
> test
> cases) (don't expect quick delivery)
>
>
> comments on agenda?
> sorry it's a few hours late.
> Lots of open actions on me; I hope to make progress on them
> before the telcon.
>
>
> 2. issue wsdlAbstractProtocol
>
>
> ACTION: DanC to try splitting SparqlQuery interface into SparqlGraph
> SparqlBindings
>
> if I don't manage to make progress on this before the telcon,
> I hope we can close the issue using the editor's draft as written.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
> revision 1.48 to 1.51 which is, as far as this issue
> is concerned, the same as the 27 May WD.
>
>
>
> 3. issue: fromUnionQuery
>
> We're badly in need of a summary of recent email. I hope
> to put one together, though I'll be happy if somebody beats
> me to it.
>
>
> 4. issue valueTesting
>
> ACTION: DanC to send comment on non-use of
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes to schema comments list
>
>
> ACTION: EricP to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe cf.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#extendedType-eq-pass
>
>
> ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal
>
> I gather Steve filled in for DaveB and that this is pretty much
> ready.
>
>
>
>
> 5. punctuationSyntax
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax
>
> "I have updated the grammar in rq23 in preparation for the LC candidate. 
> ..."
>  --  
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0262.html
>
>
>
> 6. pending Comments
>
> ACTION: DanC to noodle on uri() and str() issue from email
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0239.html
>
>
> ACTION: DanC to rethink the use/mention issue w.r.t Tim's email
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0154.html
>
> this one is still pending too:
> SPARQL requirements (and INSERT)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Mar/0077.html
>
>
> 7. Last Call for SPARQL QL
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ 1.373 $ of $Date: 2005/06/06 
> 14:45:18
>
> impact of decisions above?
>
> a number of @@s remain; how many of them need input from people
> other than the editors?
>
> 2 reviewers?
>
> last call duration
>
> last call comment handling process
>
>
>
> 8. Last call for SPARQL protocol
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
> revision 1.48 date: 2005/06/03 20:38:20
> (and status tweaks thru $Revision: 1.51 $ of $Date: 2005/06/06 18:35:00 
> $ )
>
> a few TODOs remain (in red). target for finishing them?
>
> 2 reviewers?
>
> last call start, duration?
>
>
> 9. Last call for SPARQL Query Results XML Format
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/
> $Revision: 1.29 $ of $Date: 2005/05/03 09:58:04 $
>
> i.e. no changes since 27 May.
>
> various red notes remain. target for finishing them?
>
>
>
> ** local times
>      [      tlt:localTime  (
>            "Amsterdam"
>            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Brussels"
>            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Chicago"
>            "Tue 9:30 AM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Helsinki"
>            "Tue 5:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "London"
>            "Tue 3:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "New York"
>            "Tue 10:30 AM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Rome"
>            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Tokyo"
>            "Tue 11:30 PM"  ),
>                     (
>            "Vancouver"
>            "Tue 7:30 AM"  );
>             tlt:startTimePage
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=07&month=06&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0>;
>             cal:dtstart  [
>                 cal:dateTime "2005-06-07T14:30Z" ] ].
>
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 07:39:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT