W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Name of a graph? and FROM and FROM NAMED

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:04:44 +0100
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050604090444.GB3654@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 06:21:08PM +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >Here I'm not only using the "representation" terminology, but
> >also following Andy's later suggestion that FROM and FROM NAMED
> >completely specify the dataset (which seems somewhat
> >responsive to Yoshio's proposal, though it's not quite the same).
> >
> >
> >
> >>>Does any one have an example where it woudl nto be GETted in some way?
> >>
> >>Yes, in the case that the service is itsself a cache, and the service has
> >>chosen to identify graphs by thier resolved URIs, or where there is
> >>application level knowledge that the service should not resolve the URI
> >>for security or performance reasons.
> >
> >
> >Those cases seem consistent with the "representation" terminology, to
> >me.
> 
> Steve - is there any text you can suggest to b eclear about this.  I've 
> noted Dan's suggested text in the document so it gets incorporated.  Does 
> it address the point you raised?
> 
> In particular, there shouldn't be an implication that the graph is obtained 
> at query execution time.  Caching can always happen and one web cache is 
> the local agent.

Yes, that seems fine.

- Steve
Received on Saturday, 4 June 2005 09:04:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT