W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

RE: Happy with XQuery/XPath last call specs?

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 17:03:42 -0700
Message-Id: <200505100003.j4A03eQW014342@pyramid-01.kattare.com>
To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
> Sent: May 9, 2005 8:33 AM
> To: RDF Data Access Working Group
> Subject: Happy with XQuery/XPath last call specs?
> 
> 
> The XQuery/XPath specs that we're using are in last call,
> closing this Friday, 13 May.
> 
> Are they OK? As far as I know, they're OK.

Far as I know they're ok as well, at least as related to the few areas we're
drawing on. There have been a couple of changes in the most recent draft
that are generating some interesting public discussion, but nothing that
affects what we're doing as far as I can see.
 
> Provided I get a second and no objections, I'll send a
> formal comment to that effect this week some time.

No objection from me. Consider it seconded.

> 
> For reference, we discussed this in our 2005-04-19 teleconference...
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0142.html
> 
> based on my 15 Apr message "connections to xpath-functions, last call"
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0106.html
> 
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2005 00:03:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT