- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:34:41 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Jeen Broekstra wrote: > Jeen Broekstra wrote: > >> >>Seaborne, Andy wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >> >>>Good - but I'm still unclear. It is possible to have a test with one >>>of each kind in the results and get a defined ordering. >> >> >>Yes. For example test case 3 does this: it contains a single unbound >>(and several ordered bound values) in the result. >> >>I'll include a few more, similar cases later, hopefully today. >> >>(By the way, the sorting test cases can be found at >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/. Sorry for >> forgetting the ref earlier). > > > I've checked in a test case for sorting three values, all of which are > different terms: a bnode, a URI and a (typed) literal. Test sort-8 in > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/manifest.ttl. I have checked out the new test and my implementation can pass them. The tests are a good coverage of the sorting proposal in rq23. I propose the tests in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/ address the issue and should be adopted. Andy <snip/>
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:34:59 UTC