W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: more sorting test cases

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:34:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4277A821.2040402@hp.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org



Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> 
>>
>>Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>Good - but I'm still unclear.  It is possible to have a test with one 
>>>of each kind in the results and get a defined ordering.
>>
>>
>>Yes. For example test case 3 does this: it contains a single unbound 
>>(and several ordered bound values) in the result.
>>
>>I'll include a few more, similar cases later, hopefully today.
>>
>>(By the way, the sorting test cases can be found at
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/. Sorry for
>> forgetting the ref earlier).
> 
> 
> I've checked in a test case for sorting three values, all of which are 
> different terms: a bnode, a URI and a (typed) literal. Test sort-8 in 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/manifest.ttl.

I have checked out the new test and my implementation can pass them.  The tests 
are a good coverage of the sorting proposal in rq23.

I propose the tests in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/ 
address the issue and should be adopted.

	Andy

<snip/>
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:34:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT