W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Apr

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:53:21 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1113839601.3004.33.camel@localhost>

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda

  2005-04-19T14:30Z ** local times below

  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/04/19-dawg-irc

scribe: JeenB

regrets: Jos De Roo
regrets 2005-04-26: Jos De Roo

record for review:
Minutes of RDF Data Access WG telcon 2005-04-12 for review
(note ammendments in replies)

next meeting: 26 Apr. scribe volunteer?

note the following done without discussion:
  ACTION AndyS: take out the reification syntax

Unless there is progress I have not seen, let's
continue the following without discussion:

ACTION: DaveB to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer

comments on agenda?

2. issue: fromUnionQuery

ACTION SteveH: write up the use case that can't be handled by the
current design - data management of background graph
Radio station metadata use case

ACTION AndyS: add syntax to specify datasets in the query language


Revision 1.296  2005/04/13 14:26:36  aseaborne
+ Bare text for section on specifying graphs in datasets

ACTION KendallC: draft protocol section on specifying datasets
(fromUnionQuery) including WSDL types and HTTP examples

Revision 1.27  2005/04/16 18:59:52  kclark
- synched discussion of RDF dataset with latest in rq23
- added xslt-bundle to SparqlQuery.query.In
- synched with sparql-protocol-types.xsd

ACTION EricP: try out the "2 list of URIs" datasets design from

3. issue: wsdlAbstractProtocol

ACTION: KendallC to own wsdlAbstractProtocol (based on WSDL description
added to protocol to editor's draft).

To what extent do recent edits address this?

Anything experience from Tuscany that should impact the protocol design?

4. issue: xmlAbstractSyntax

ACTION: KendallC to work out remaining details in sparqlx.{rnc,xsd,rng}:
expression syntax, order-by stuff (xmlAbstractSyntax)

To what extent do recent edits address this?

5. protocol publication candidate

ACTION: KendallC to incorporate EricP's privacy text, salting to taste

last publication was 14 January 2005.
Pub candidate sometime soonish?

6. issue: valueTesting

ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal ETA 19

ACTION: HowardK to seek clarification on valueTesting w.r.t. differenced
from XQuery

ACTION: AndyS to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe

7. issue: sort

ACTION JeenB: Write a few sort test cases.

8. SPARQL QL publication candidate

(I gather it'll be published by the time we meet, but
it won't have addressed all the pending stuff, so Pat's
review is still relevant...)

ACTION: PatH to internal review of rq23

9. test suite maintenance (time permitting)

ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page
ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no
ACTION: SteveH to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named
ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to
valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery)
ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple

      [      tlt:localTime  (
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 9:30 AM"  ),
            "Tue 5:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 3:30 PM"  ),
            "New York"
            "Tue 10:30 AM"  ),
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 11:30 PM"  ),
            "Tue 7:30 AM"  );
             cal:dtstart  [
                 cal:dateTime "2005-04-19T14:30Z" ] ].

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 16:49:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:47 UTC