W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

connections to xpath-functions, last call

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:41:36 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1113579697.4891.427.camel@localhost>

Eric, Howard,

F&O is at last call.

"Comments on this document are due by 13 May 2005"

I told PaulC a while ago that DAWG would review it.

It seems to me that we have already done the bulk of the
review work; that is EricP has pored over it in detail,
and Andy and others have looked at it now and again,
and Howard has guided us through it somewhat and
would have let us know if something big
had changed recently or if we were using it all wrong.

But just to be sure, after the upcoming WD publication,
please cite F&O in the style recommended in the W3C manual of style:

<a name="XFO" id="XFO">XFO</a>
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xpath-functions-20050404/">XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators</a>
</cite>, J. Melton, A. Malhotra, N. Walsh,  Editors, W3C Working Draft (work in progress), 4 April 2005, http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xpath-functions-20050404/ . <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/">Latest version</a> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/ .</dd>

That's generated by the Bibliography generator, as I mentioned 21 March...
references, acknowledgements

Then, please go over each of the links from rq23 into XQuery, e.g.

  XQuery defines a set of _Numeric Type Promotions_.

and mark them up ala the W3C manual of style, including traditional
hardcopy-style section references...

  ...as is done for the 'page' property of CSS2 ([CSS2], section


... and when you're looking up the section numbers, spot-check that
what you find on the other end of that link is what SPARQL says
you will find there.

My goal is that EricP will do that, and Howard will double-check
his work, and maybe one or two other WG members will dot an i
or cross a t, and nobody will find any serious problems, and I'll
notify the XQuery WG that we've concluded our review without finding
any problems, all by the 13 May deadline. That's 4 weeks from now,
some of which overlap with WWW2005 travel and such. So I don't
think there's a huge rush, but it's not something we can leave
'till the last minute, either.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 15 April 2005 15:41:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:47 UTC