W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

no need to track WG issues in SPARQL document

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:42:13 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1096497732.5269.82.camel@dirk>
I just checked for news in the SPARQL draft
and I see $Revision: 1.67 $ with the new name,
abstract and such. Good...

I suggest dropping the issues appendix. Feel free to
keep your own editor's TODO list there, but don't make it look
like a WG issues list.

The WG issues list is now

Note that I named all the issues, somewhat arbitrarily.
And I merged a few since the ftf meeting (see changelog for details).
In the future, I'll try to solicit input from the WG
on issue names; I know they occasionally matter and they're
expensive to change.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 22:42:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:45 UTC