On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:37:18AM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote: > > I've spoken with people in my lab who are doing the most with semantic > web services, including service composition using hierarchical > planners and OWL reasoners. There *is* positive overlap between our > query language, and its expressivity, and computing constraints and > requirements for web services. > > For example, some web service planning scenarios use OWL and KB > reasoning to track the state of the world, figuring out preconditions > and effects, for example, in an OWL-S scenario. But other scenarios > (and groups and tools) use RDF to represent the state of the world > and, thus, are using things like RDQL to compute > constraints. Presumably in these scenarios, a DAWG query language > would be useful too. It sounds like there OWL expressions that we *can't* do in SPARQL. I'd have expected that, given a backend engine that is complete with regard to OWL, we'd have sufficient expressivity to query all inferences that were expressed in RDF. Are they querying any inferences that aren't RDF? > I think this message should be taken as discharing CTION KendallC: > investigate overlap between RDF query and web service constraints. > > Kendall Clark -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia) (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 10:23:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:31 GMT