On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:04:46 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: > I don't mind which style of design - I would go for whatever the XML > community see as most appropriate for processing with XSLT and XQuery. +1 > 2/ Do XML literals go in as XML subtrees? > I assume so - so using the same tags as the wrapper may arise and a > poorly written XPath may (mis)match. Not sure we can remove all > situations of this. Sometimes may actually want it. > Worse case: a query result as XML literal within an XML result set. > Example: querying a detailed server log file of queries and their > results. I would expect XML Literals to be escaped, so they can be handled the same way as other literal types, and to make processing easier in non-XSLT applications. - SteveReceived on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 20:12:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT