W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: F2F3 notes

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:04:41 +0100
Message-ID: <8D5B24B83C6A2E4B9E7EE5FA82627DC93967AF@sdcexcea01.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>




-------- Original Message --------
> From: Dan Connolly <mailto:connolly@w3.org>
> Date: 28 September 2004 18:02
> 
> On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 11:20, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > "syntax.txt" has the votes in as  I wrote it down
> > "syntax-proposal.txt" has the outline starting point we discussed
> 
> Thanks, but I think DaveB already provided most of that stuff
> (and I put it in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf3-brs#qlsyn )

I misunderstood then.

> 
> The @@ in the meeting record refers to some live-editing you did on
> the definitions. in item "section 2, Making Simple Queries, core
tests"
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf3-brs#core-defs
> 
> Is that editing subsumed by v1.60 of
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ ?

Live editting of the doc is subsumed by v1.60 - changes should have been
made and the notes removed in the version where the change happened.

	Andy

> 
> 
> > 	Andy
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 17:05:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT