On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:40:35AM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:47:05AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > >> > >> In recent discussions over email and on IRC this morning we hit a > >> difference of implementation in some RDF storage systems. > >> > >> In my system if you load multiple graphs with distinct source information > >> and the same statement appears in 2 graphs there are two distinct > >> statements. The same goes for statements that may be inferred by multiple > >> routes. > > > >Discussing this further it appears to be a philosophical difference: does > >an RDF store hold a single (merged) RDF graph with statements from > >different sources, or does it hold a set of RDF graphs. > > Surely the right answer is, yes. That is, it could be either. Its up > to the owner responsible for maintaining the store to decide. So the > QL ought to be able to handle both cases, which I think is the case > right now. I agree, if so we have to agree on wether results are implicitly DISTINT or if (A, A) == (A) in query results. - SteveReceived on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 16:28:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:41:58 GMT