On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:43:10AM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote: > > >From our comments list: > > ----- Forwarded message from Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> ----- > > In > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20040802/ > > I note that there is a design objective that > [[ > 4.8 Literal Search > > It should be possible for a query to perform substring searches of RDF > string literals. > ]] > and a requirement > [[ > 3.3 Extensible Value Testing > ]] > > but no requirement to be able to search on langtag of plain literals, > nor the datatype of typed literals. > > This seems like an omission, since the langtag gives vital information > in multilingual documents. Also it may often be useful to find all > literals with a particular datatype. > > Ideally some langtag matching such as language ranges or lang tag > fallback, as described in RFC 3066 would be best. We can also get a use case from PICS, which, in current thinking (according to danbri), requires beginsWith, endsWith, contains, and matches application rules (no idea what the latter is). -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia) (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 15:03:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:41:58 GMT