- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:02:05 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 11:43:19 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > I think I guess this is time to propose an alternative since the > abutting of SOURCE ?src near a triple isn't working as far as clarity > goes. This is because that in > SOURCE ?src (?x ?y ?z) > users are unsure if SOURCE ?src is part of the () following or > previous. One simple approach is to move the term in the triple: > > (?x ?y ?z SOURCE ?src) I quite like that form, its clear what SOURCE refers too. > which could be used like > (?x ?y ?z)->foo:bar(1) > > where 'source' is a standard name. This uses a bit too much line-noise for my tastes. - Steve
Received on Friday, 24 September 2004 11:02:13 UTC