On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:18:25AM -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > it doesn't separate the similar QLs from the distinct ones, > but that isn't easy. suggestions welcome. > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/DAWG-QL-name/2~ That URI is wrong, of course; this is the correct one: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/DAWG-QL-name/ But this is a bit flawed: there are at least two recent name ideas missing: DART (for protocol) SPARQL (for protocol and QL) Please add them. KendallReceived on Thursday, 23 September 2004 12:28:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:31 GMT