Re: issues list separated from BRQL spec

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:25:45PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
> 
> My issue is described as "SOURCE premature stdization" to
> which my answer is "no it isn't premature", as at least 3 members
> of the WG have already reported that they implement and want such
> tracking.  @semantics in rdfstore, Southampton in 3store, me
> in redland (tucana in kowari maybe also).  I assume the WG
> generally knows this.

Mindlab wants and uses a tool, rdflib, that supports it. For the
record.

Kendall

Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:30:23 UTC