Re: Syntax modifications

On Aug 31, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Steve Harris wrote:

>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>>> yes it makes sense - but I then do not understand why we need to make
>>> the syntax so much N3 like, using PREFIX and use :prefix notation
>>> instead of current RDQL USING prefix FOR <URI>
>>
>> RDQL syntax can't handle the default prefix.
>
> How about ommiting the FOR for the default?
>
> USING <http://my.default.prefix>,
>       ex FOR <http://example.com/>

this a clever one!

congrats Steve :-)

Alberto