Re: Syntax modifications

On Aug 31, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Seaborne, Andy wrote:

>> yes it makes sense - but I then do not understand why we need to make
>> the syntax so much N3 like, using PREFIX and use :prefix notation
>> instead of current RDQL USING prefix FOR <URI>
>
> RDQL syntax can't handle the default prefix.

true - I did not think about that one

cheers

Alberto