- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 06:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Kendall Clark wrote: > Sorry, I don't mean to be nasty, the asemantics guys are great!, but > these are all much worse than "?foo". Pick another one then :) - pretty much all other chars are safe except for the surrounders, _ and % if you ignore languages and just consider DB interfaces. How about select =id, =title where (=id ... to signal the 'link' ? OR how about just dropping it completely select id title from <dbms://localhost/rfid> where (id foo:id <urn:froefroe... .. using foo ... by simply insisting that any and all literals have a "" or '' , URI's always have a <> around them and anything else must use a : separator for the namepsace ? Also think of the upside; do this right and you can instantly allow ANY language/installation which has an ODBC, JDBC, ADO, whatever SQL interface do semantic web queries with virtually no rework on the client side. AND you get at least some instant buy in from the people currently in control of data storage and the SQL bastion. Dw
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 13:19:54 UTC