- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Kendall Clark wrote: > this *kind* of consideration. Yes, Java is an important implementation > platform; but this seems an awful reason *by itself* to use something It is more the general case of *DBC connectors carrying some sort of SQL; regardless of language. Right now in SQL, and its derivatives, the '?' ised used for parameterized queries with a lot of global and local variable connotations which are substitued at run time. We are using it slightly different in our case. Simply avoiding it confuses the developers less; makes the learning curve easier and costs us nothing at this stage. Apart from less confusion it -also- allows for a very clean migration using exisitng *DBC connectors. Dw
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 13:02:36 UTC