W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: do we need INSERT?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:34:41 -0500
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1093620881.2934.4390.camel@dirk>


On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 10:15, Kendall Clark wrote:
[...]
> Is this outside our brief?

yes:
http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter#update


> PS--I find I *really* want triple patterns to be delimited by
> parentheses instead of brackets in BRQL. Is that a done deal?

No.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 15:34:13 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kendall Clark: "Re: do we need INSERT?"
Previous message: Seaborne, Andy: "RE: do we need INSERT?"
In reply to: Kendall Clark: "do we need INSERT?"
Next in thread: Kendall Clark: "Re: do we need INSERT?"
Reply: Kendall Clark: "Re: do we need INSERT?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:41:58 GMT