W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: Language document update

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:48:38 +0100
Message-ID: <E864E95CB35C1C46B72FEA0626A2E80803E3BF2E@0-mail-br1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>


-------- Original Message --------
> From: Dan Connolly <mailto:connolly@w3.org>
> Date: 23 August 2004 22:33
> 
> On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 10:13, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > Eric and I have been working on the language document and will
> > continue to do so. 
> > 
> >     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
> > 
> > This is still incomplete.
> 
> I see $Revision: 1.38 $ of $Date: 2004/08/22 04:10:17 $ ...
> 
> >  The goal of the document is to meet the needs of
> > someone wanting a complete description of the language and also to
> > define the language in precise terms.
> > 
> > We would like comments on any area but especially:
> > 
> > + Sections 2,3,4, which start on SELECT, constraints and optionals.
> > + document structure
> > + approach of mixing examples and formal description. 
> 
> Is that still what you want feedback on the most?

Yes - all feedback welcome.  Those areas are the most important; content
comments on structure and style are more important that presentation matters
at this stage. Section 4 is going to be revised and completed very soon (the
next day or so).

> 
> Ideally, I'd get a version of this that a couple reviewers
> could go over with a fine-tooth-comb before the ftf meeting...
> at least the parts of the spec that are not at issue.

Point noted.  The current draft is OK for comments.  A F2F-checkpoint draft
will be ready by at least two weeks before the meeting.  

	Andy

> 
> > 	Andy
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 08:49:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT